This material is copyrighted. Except for your own private use, you may not copy or reproduce it in any way without express permission from Cascadia Training.
The Therapeutic Alliance: Reclaiming the Essential Ingredient for Evidence Based Treatment in the 21st Century
Presented and developed by Brenda Butterfield, EdD, MSW, LMHC
Limited to 12 attendees.
"So what is the therapeutic alliance and what conditions are necessary for it to develop?"
"What does over 70 years of research suggest about the efficacy of the alliance in mental health treatment?"
"How do client outcomes of CBT and other manualized interventions (CBT, DBT, EMDR, etc.) compare to those of non-directive psychotherapy that focus on developing an alliance?"
"The alliance is developed by both client and clinician. But, according to the latest research, who plays the lead role?"
"How does the clinician's actions, behaviors, psychological health and overall wellbeing link to treatment outcomes for clients?"
"How does clinician self-care relate to the alliance and therefore to treatment outcomes?"
"Given the professional milieu, ones title and the reality of the work site, how can a clinician or administrator reclaim this time-tested, evidence based intervention?"
CBT, DBT, MBCT and EMDR. Although not an exclusive list, they are some of the preferred, manualized or directive treatment methods used today. Insurance companies, government organizations and private funders increasingly expect clinicians to use them when providing therapy. Viewed as "evidence based" they often overshadow another proven effective, researched based intervention that is non-directive and client-centered; the therapeutic alliance. Current thinking suggests manualized interventions like DBT result in better treatment outcomes. For various reasons, they are also perceived to increase efficiency of service delivery.
The logic: teach clinicians what to DO and when to DO it in order to improve treatment outcomes. Improved treatment outcomes translate into increased efficiency.
But, does this logic make sense? Are treatment outcomes better when manualized interventions are used to treat clients? Are mental health services improving overall? Is the system becoming more efficient and cost effective?
A growing number are questioning the logic. While some manualized interventions are indeed supported by data as effective, clinicians and administrators need to know there are other factors with greater effect sizes that contribute to psychotherapy outcomes, like the therapeutic alliance (Norcross and Lambert, 2010). Having stood the test of time for nearly 70 years, research reveals, "The alliance....is (still) one of the strongest validated factors influencing therapy success" (Wampold, 2001). Maslow, Rogers, Jung, Peck, and other highly revered humanistic clinicians knew this. They would not be surprised by research indicating 96% of people who have experienced improvement from therapy say it's the relationship that made it effective (Norcross, 2014).
It's also imperative for administrators and clinicians to know about the Equivalent Outcomes Paradox. It's one of the most consistent findings of psychotherapy research, revealing that different models of psychotherapy (CBT, DBT, Client-Centered, etc.) with varying theoretical orientations achieve broadly similar outcomes. As the debate continues about manualized versus non-manualized interventions, the mechanization of mental health care gains momentum. Clinicians know the impact first-hand, often feeling disempowered by ever-changing billing practices and increasing system requirements to document more and talk less. Passion to do this work is thwarted. Resentments creep in and result in negative thoughts and feelings about "the system", insurance companies, employers and even about colleagues. Negative thinking seldom stops after leaving the office. Experiencing chronic stress leads to job dissatisfaction, burn out and some leave the profession altogether.
Managing the pressure to increase efficiency without compromising the quality of care is a business priority and an ethical necessity for clinicians and administrators alike. Given the current ethos of the profession, how can the therapeutic alliance be remembered, let alone reclaimed?
Paying attention to the impact of this new priority on client outcomes is critically important. Equally important, however, is recognizing its impact on service providers like clinicians. Recent research suggests clinicians' overall wellbeing is actually more important than the client's toward influencing the therapeutic alliance (Del Re, Fluckiger, Horvath, Sumonds, & Wampold, 2012). The relationship between alliance and treatment outcomes is well established in literature.
Rediscovering the reasons for becoming a mental health professional is essential to job satisfaction and overall wellbeing. Learning how to take care of one's body, mind and soul not only helps manage ongoing pressures and improve job satisfaction, it also appears to be clinically relevant to treatment outcomes for clients. (Del Re, eta al, 2012).
- Explore and understand the therapeutic alliance
- Review research findings about the relationship between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes for clients
- Learn 3 essential ingredients to cultivate a therapeutic alliance with clients
- Learn specific therapist attributes and techniques to help develop a therapeutic alliance with clients
- Explore tools used to assess the therapeutic alliance with clients
- Identify challenges to "Care" for and "Be" with clients
- Learn about the correlation between clinician's wellbeing, the alliance and treatment outcomes for client's
- Recognize the importance of clinicians self-care
- Find ways to honor the alliance, regardless of role or work setting.
Continuing Education (CE) Information
Cascadia Training is a NBCC Approved Continuing Education Provider (Provider #: 6575.) and by the Washington State Office of Public Instruction as a "Washington State Approved Clock Hour Offering Workshop.
Brenda S. Butterfield, EdD, MSW, LMHC
Brenda Butterfield, EdD, MSW, LMHC is a strengths based social worker, metaphysical therapist and innovative teacher. Her unique educational background mirrors her wide array of clinical experience in child welfare, mental health, substance abuse and education both domestic and abroad.
Dr. Butterfield received her Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from the University of Minnesota-Duluth in 1989. She earned a Masters in Social Work from the University of Washington School of Social Work in 1998. Recently she completed a Doctorate Degree in Education from the University of Minnesota in 2014, specializing in the Psychology of Teaching and Learning.
Prior to starting her private practice, Meta Counseling and Consulting, Dr. Butterfield was an award-winning faculty member of the Psychology Department at the University of Minnesota- Duluth. During her tenure Dr. Butterfield received multiple awards from students, colleagues, and community organizations for teaching excellence and leadership. She has presented at national and international conferences and was invited to serve as a Guest Lecturer teaching psychology courses at the University of Birmingham in England. She has worked and throughout Africa, England, Europe and the Middle East.
In addition to teaching, Dr. Butterfield has over fifteen years of clinical practice working with children, youth, families, communities, and organizations. Recently Dr. Butterfield returned to the Pacific Northwest and transitioned out of teaching in higher education to develop her private practice. Serving youth, families, women, and organizations by emphasizing empowerment through self-reflection and psycho-education are her areas of expertise.
Dr. Butterfield's work reflects the nexus of education, psychology, and social work. Her services are best described as holistic, strengths based, and goal oriented. She uses a metaphysical approach, and when requested a spiritual approach, to support the development of full human potential. In addition to individual, family, and group therapy, Dr. Butterfield presents workshops and provides consulting services to organizations, mental health practitioners, and parents of children struggling to succeed in school.
Upcoming Dates and Registration
Date: Friday, December 29th, 2017
Time: 9:00am - 4:30pm
Cost: $155.00 USD
Campus: Wong Fleming Conference Room, Redmond, WA
Map: Directions to our campus location.